Article: 262094 of talk.bizarre Newsgroups: talk.bizarre From: email@example.com (Scott Dorsey) Subject: Re: horndog mail, posted for your perusal Message-ID: <kludgeDJ8KwH.JEB@netcom.com> Organization: Institute for Boatanchor Studies References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 21:55:29 GMT Lines: 20 Sender: email@example.com Status: O X-Status: In article <firstname.lastname@example.org> email@example.com (Meredith Tanner) writes: > >> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 1995 20:50:31 -0600 (CST) >> From: patterson chris <firstname.lastname@example.org> >> To: Meredith Tanner <email@example.com> >> Subject: Re: Real life intrudes >> >> Hot pants... shame shame shame...send picture > >what a charmer. Is it my imagination, or overall is the quality of unsolicited horndog mail from women much better than that from men? I mean, at the very least, I have never received an incoherent message from a woman which offered something incomprehensible, and I seem to get them from men on a fairly regular basis. And I am straight. At the very least, I would expect a stronger standard of literacy. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."